Showing posts with label F. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F. Show all posts

Jul 20, 2009

FRANCIS II, EMPEROR OF AUSTRIA (1768–1835)

FRANCIS II, EMPEROR OF AUSTRIA (1768–1835)

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — critcalmass @ 5:45 am

180px-francis_i.jpg

Francis II was the last Holy Roman emperor, the first emperor of Austria, and king of Hungary and Bohemia. Francis Joseph Charles was born on February 12, 1768, in Florence. The eldest son of Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany and future Holy Roman emperor, and his wife, Archduchess Maria Louisa of Spain, Francis would have 15 siblings. He was reared by a gentle governess in simple surroundings. Through private tutors, Francis was taught religion, languages, translation, history, writing, arithmetic, and sports in a strict daily educational regimen that began at 7 a.m. and ended at 5 p.m. Exacting order combined with a methodical upbringing were his educational mainstays. Francis enjoyed learning about the historical vagaries of Europe’s royal houses. He concluded that the downfall of Athens was due to its democratic form of government and distrusted the idea of letting the people take part in government. Francis became a steadfast and absolute conservative, his beliefs never wavering.

Francis grew up to be vain, arrogant, miserly, deceitful, suspicious, and critical. He scarcely paid attention to his lessons, often misbehaved, and was apathetic to matters not directly related to him. He moved to Vienna and joined his uncle Emperor Joseph II in 1784. Francis’s work habits changed; he learned to work diligently and attained an encyclopedic knowledge. In Vienna he began to assemble what would become a 40,000-volume library and a magnificent portrait collection. Francis disagreed with Emperor Joseph’s liberal innovations, and as a future monarch he tried to learn what mistakes to avoid.

To complete his studies, Francis became involved in the Habsburg Empire’s military affairs, which he enjoyed. This final component of his education taught him an immense capacity for work, a trait that never deserted him. He studied every aspect of military affairs in excruciatingly close detail. Francis also fought in numerous battles and learned to enjoy war. He also traveled extensively through his uncle’s domains and took copious notes in his journals about the places he visited and the characteristics of the people he met. Francis also demonstrated a strong interest in the economies and societies of the lands through which he traveled.

Empress Maria Theresa and Emperor Joseph II arranged Francis’s marriage to Duchess Elizabeth Wilhelmina Louise of Württemberg. The ceremony was held on January 6, 1788, but Elizabeth died on February 19, 1790, after a difficult birth. The baby, Ludovica, herself died 16 months later. Further tragedy in Francis’s life ensued: Emperor Joseph died on March 1, and on May 15, Francis’s mother died. His second marriage to a cousin, Maria Theresa of the Kingdom of Naples, on August 15, 1790, produced 12 children, of whom only 7 reached adulthood.

Upon Joseph II’s death, Francis became Holy Roman emperor on March 1, 1792, at the age of 24. He inherited a troubling legacy: the Holy Roman Empire consisted of far-fl ung domains, from the Austrian Netherlands in the Low Countries to the middle of Europe, including most of Germany and parts of northern Italy, and of eastern Europe, consisting of present-day Croatia, Hungary, and Bohemia. These countries were populated by multiethnic groups who vied with one another for primacy. Francis also faced territorial encroachment, not only from Russia, Prussia, and the Ottoman Empire, but more ominously from France.

Francis strongly opposed the ideology behind the French Revolution, which preached the spread of equality and liberty not only throughout France but beyond her borders. Queen Marie Antoinette, Francis’s aunt, and her husband, King Louis XVI, had both been guillotined in 1793. His cousins, the couple’s children, were kept in prison, where 10-year-old Louis XVII died.

Francis fought against the French in five wars during his reign. His determination to maintain the status of his royal house led to several foreign policy disasters during his period of rule. The Treaty of Campo Formio (October 17, 1797) not only destroyed the First Coalition against France but also substantially redrew the map of Europe. As a result of this settlement, Francis was forced to cede Belgium to France, by which he lost 1.5 million subjects, in exchange for Venice, Istria, Friuli, and Dalmatia, by which he gained a half-million subjects. He also ceded some islands in the Mediterranean, including Corfu. The French were guaranteed free navigation of the Rhine, Moselle, and Meuse rivers, and Austria was forced to recognize the Cisalpine and Ligurian republics—satellite states of revolutionary France.

As a result of French victories at the battles of Marengo and of Hohenlinden on June 14 and December 3, 1800, respectively, on February 9, 1801, Francis was forced to conclude the Treaty of Lunéville, which confirmed and extended the terms of Campo Formio. Austria was the principal member of the Second Coalition against France but was defeated at the Battle of Austerlitz on December 2, 1805, as a result of which Francis had, by the Treaty of Pressburg on December 26, to cede Venice, Tyrol, Swabia, and Dalmatia to France or her allies. On August 6, 1806, Napoleon forced Francis to renounce his title as Holy Roman emperor and assume in its stead the designation of Emperor Francis I of Austria.

In 1806 Napoleon established the Confederation of the Rhine, which initially consisted of 16 German states that had been part of the Holy Roman Empire under Francis. Napoleon used the territory, with a population of 15 million inhabitants, as a counterbalance to Austria and Prussia. The Confederation would eventually accept 23 more German states. Napoleon created the kingdoms of Württemberg and Bavaria as well as grand duchies and principalities, all under his auspices. As part of the Fifth Coalition, Austria was again defeated in 1809. The Treaty of Schönbrunn, signed on October 14, 1809, cost the Habsburgs considerable territorial losses, and nearly 2 million inhabitants found themselves under new rulers.

In 1810 Napoleon stood at the height of his power, but only after making many enemies. Francis had little choice but to allow his daughter Archduchess Marie Louise to marry the French emperor on March 11, 1810, in Vienna, and on April 1 in Paris. The marriage was politically arranged by Austrian foreign minister Clemens von Metternich and produced a son, Napoleon II, known as the king of Rome.

Austria was finally victorious in the campaigns against Napoleon of 1813 and 1814 as a result of a grand alliance with Russia, Prussia, and Britain. The Congress of Vienna, which convened in the wake of the Napoleonic Wars, largely returned Europe back to the conservative style of politics that had existed before the French Revolution. Francis himself, who believed his authority was granted by God, vehemently opposed the influence of revolutionary thought in Austria, where he strictly adhered to the repressive policies pursued by Metternich despite the criticism he received from liberals throughout Europe who deemed him a tyrant. Francis opposed reform and insisted on employing his own antiquated methods of governance, as a result of which the Habsburg political system grew stagnant. Francis died in Vienna on March 2, 1835, and was buried in the Imperial Crypt.
»»  read more

Fourier, François Marie Charles. 1772-1837

Fourier, FranÇois Marie Charles(1772–1837)

François Marie Charles Fourier, the French social critic, utopian socialist, and eccentric, was born into a merchant family in Besançon. Except during the French Revolution, Charles Fourier led a quiet and isolated life as a minor business employee and bachelor in Paris, Lyons, Rouen, and elsewhere in France, with occasional trips abroad. Shortly after the turn of the nineteenth century, Fourier began to develop his doctrine, publishing his first major work, Théorie des quatres mouvements et des destinées générales, in 1808. He continued throughout his life to elaborate and propagate his views with a single-minded devotion, acquired some followers, and was able to dedicate his last years entirely to his self-appointed task.

After a superficial classical secondary education in a Jesuit school in Besançon, Fourier was entirely self-taught. His reading was confined largely to contemporary periodicals and often apparently to bits of articles or merely to headlines. His views reflect many ideas of the Enlightenment and of the early nineteenth century, with strong Rousseauistic and physiocratic strains.

Fourier believed that, because the world had been created by a benevolent deity and yet wallowed in misery, men had obviously failed to carry out the divine plan. The plan was discovered by Fourier, and it had to be translated into practice. Happiness would then replace misery, unity would replace division, Harmony would replace Civilization. The transformation would occur through the release of man's thirteen passions, instilled by God but repressed in Civilization: the five senses; the four "group," or social, passions of ambition, friendship, love, and family feeling; the three "series," or distributive, passions, that is, the "cabalist," or passion for intrigue, the papillone (butterfly), or passion for diversification, and the "composite," or passion for combining pleasures; and, finally, the passion for harmony, which synthesizes all the others. With the passions released, existence would become intense joy, and a lifetime would seem but a moment.

To accomplish the release of the passions, humanity would have to be organized into phalanxes of about eighteen hundred men, women, and children. In each phalanx different characters and inclinations would be scientifically combined in a complex and finely graded system of groups and series so that each person could give full expression, in his work and in his other activities, to all his passions, tastes, and capacities, and avoid everything that did not suit him. The economies accomplished by communal work and living and by finding the right place for every talent, and the enormous enthusiasms and energies mobilized by the new order, would make phalanxes extremely successful economically as well as in terms of human happiness. Indeed, a single trial phalanx would prove its absolute superiority within a few weeks or, at the most, months and, through imitation, abolish Civilization in a year or two. Moreover, the savages and barbarians who had stubbornly resisted Civilization would eagerly join Harmony. The result would be one world of happy phalanxes, linked vaguely by a hierarchy of monarchs and more effectively by temporary industrial armies for special tasks and similar touring bands of poets, actors, and musicians. Fourier's life became a constant search for the means to establish a trial phalanx, and his political, social, and other preferences were all subordinated to this one great purpose. Fourier believed his main enemies to be the philosophes of all sorts, with their "400,000 false volumes."

Fourier's ideas for transforming society were linked to peculiar views on man's past and to strange cosmological beliefs and "analogical" methods (Fourier argued "by analogy" in dealing with all elements of the cosmos). Because the world was one, the coming of Harmony would lead to new, beneficial creations on earth and would result in the appearance of new satellites, in the regaining of health by our planet, and in more distant desirable cosmic repercussions. At the moment, however, earth remained deplorably behind other planets, and Fourier hoped that sufficiently powerful telescopes would enable men to observe the system of Harmony as practiced by the Solarians or the inhabitants of Jupiter. Fantastic details of many kinds abound in Fourier's writings, and the very form of the writings is frequently bizarre.

In addition to giving rise to Fourierist communal experiments and anticipating cooperatives, Fourier has exercised a broad general influence as social critic, early socialist, and man of many insights, especially psychological ones. Fourier's criticism, appreciated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels among others, is notable for its fundamental character, its incisiveness, its richness, and its lack of compromise or nuance. It ranges from magnificent denunciations of exploitation and sham in family, society, church, and state, through striking discussions of fraudulent business practices (in particular of fraud in commerce, Fourier's bête noire), and of the appalling conditions of the masses, to a listing of dozens of different kinds of cuckoldry. Fourier was a moralist and believed that Harmony would establish truth as well as happiness among men, for truth rather than deception and hypocrisy would then become the profitable and accepted way of life.

Fourier's socialism is sui generis; he would have retained some private property, and he regarded inequality and discord as necessary for the construction of graded series and groups and the exercise of all passions. He stressed gastrosophy (the science of cuisine), opera, and horticulture rather than large-scale agriculture or industry. Far from desiring to mold man to a social purpose, he essayed to create a society where every individual whim would be satisfied. But Fourier did define man in social terms (the natural unit for lions, he said, is the couple, and for man, a phalanx, for only in a phalanx could man truly be man); and he charted an extremely complicated and interdependent socialist society, in which men own property, work, and live in common, in their specially built phalansteries, one for each phalanx.

This vision, together with his criticism of the existing system and many of his specific doctrines, places Fourier as one of the most inspired preachers and prophets of modern socialism. Fourier's remarkable psychological insights, such as his championing of brief sessions and variety in work, his quickness to see oppression no matter how veiled, and his at times penetrating concern with different character formations and problems, link him, for instance, to modern pedagogy, the emancipation of women, and personnel management. Fourier can also be described as a brilliant exponent of the idea of alienation or as a premature theoretician of the affluent society. Especially notable are his emphasis on the repression of passions as the source of all evil, as well as the foundation of Civilization, and his vision of that insane world of repressed passions.

Enlightenment; Philosophy of Social Sciences; Social and Political Philosophy; Socialism; Society.

Bibliography
Primary Works

Théorie des quatre mouvements et des destinées générales, 2 vols. Lyons, France, 1808.

Théorie de l'unité universelle. Paris, 1822.

Le nouveau monde industriel et societaire. Paris: Bossange, 1829.

La fausse industrie morcelée, répugnante, mensongère, et l'antidote: l'industrie naturelle, combinée, attrayante, véridique, donnant quadruple produit, 2 vols. Paris: Bossange, 1835–1836.

Oeuvres Complètes de Charles Fourier, 12 vols. Paris: Anthropos, 1966–1968.

Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier; Selected Texts on Work, Love, and Passionate Attraction. Translated and edited by Jonathan Beecher and Richard Bienvenu. Boston: Beacon, 1971.

The Theory of the Four Movements. Edited by Gareth Stedman Jones and Ian Patterson. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Secondary Works

Beecher, Jonathan. Charles Fourier: The Visionary and His World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.

Bourgin, Hubert. Fourier Contribution à l'étude du socialisme français. Paris: Société Nouvelle de Librairie et d'Édition, 1905.

Manuel, Frank E. The Prophets of Paris. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.

Poulat, Émil. Les cahiers manuscrits de Fourier. Paris: Entente Communautaire, 1957.

Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. The Teaching of Charles Fourier. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

Zilberfarb, I. I. Sotsialnaia Filosofiia Sharlia Fure i Ee Mesto v Istorii Sotsialisticheskoi Mysli Pervoi Poloviny XIX Veka. Moscow, 1964.

This is the complete article, containing 1,288 words (approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page).
»»  read more

Fitzherbert, Marie Anne. Mrs. Fitzherbert 1756-1837

Birth: Jul. 26, 1756
Death: Mar. 27, 1837

Royal Mistress. Born Mary Anne Smythe the eldest daughter of Walter Smythe and Mary Anne Errington. At 18 she married Edward Weld who died three months after the wedding. She married again in 1778 to Thomas Fitzherbert. He died in May 1781 leaving her a comfortable income. The Widow Fitzherbert was introduced to George, Prince of Wales in 1784 and in an utterly illegal arrangement, running directly counter to English law, the couple were allegedly and secretly married on December 15, 1785. Rumors of the secret marriage leaked out, but the Prince and Mrs. Fitzherbert remained together until 1794 when Prince George became betrothed to Caroline of Brunswick. He abruptly broke off with Mrs. Fitzherbert, leaving his erstwhile wife with a comfortable allowance and married as directed in April 1795, any contract he might have made previously was ignored as illegal. After the birth of Princess Charlotte in 1796, the prince separated from his despised wife and returned to Mrs. Fitzherbert in about 1800, they remained together until about 1811 when a split between them became permanent. Mrs. Fitzherbert retired to Brighton. She survived George IV by seven years, and died at the age of eighty at Brighton. (bio by: Iola)


Search Amazon for Maria Fitzherbert
Burial:
Saint John the Baptist Church
Brighton
East Sussex, England

Maintained by: Find A Grave
Record added: Jul 05, 2006
Find A Grave Memorial# 14828530
Maria Fitzherbert
»»  read more

Ferdinand I (Rumania). 1865-1927

King Ferdinand I Viktor Albert Meinrad od Romania (Sigmaringen, 24 August 1865 - Sinaia, 20 July 1927; married at Sigmaringen on 10 January 1893 Princess Marie of Great Britain and Ireland, Pss of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (Eastwell Park, 29 October 1875 - Pelesch Castle, 10 July 1938)

Reign: 1914 - 1927

Dynasty: Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

Predecessor: King Carol I of Romania

Successor: King Carol II of Yugoslavia

Children: King Carol II of Romania; Queen Elisabeth of Greece; Queen Maria of Yugoslavia; Prince Nicholas of Romania, Archduchess Ileana of Austria-Tuscany and Prince Mircea of Romania

Parents Ferdinand: Fürst Leopold of Hohenzollern and Princess Antonia of Portugal

Parents Marie: Prince Alfred of Great-Britain, Duke of Edinburgh, Duke of Saxe-Cobug-Gotha and Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia

Siblings Ferdinand: Fürst Wilhelm of Hohenzollern and Prince Karl Anton of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

Siblings Marie: Grand Duchess Victoria Melita of Russia; Princess Alexandra of Hohenlohe-Langeburg and Pirncess Beatrice of Spain, Duchess of Galliera

»»  read more
Loading
Chát & Gửi tin nhanh
Bài viết mới đăng

 
chào mừng bạn tới với nganling's Blog|Welcome to nganling's Blog |

Những Chuyên Mục Hot

sub link